|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Luscius Uta
Killers of Paranoid Souls
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dunno if someone else already posted that, but I found out that reduction to mwd signature radius penalty on interceptors isn't calculated...at least not on Ares and Taranis. |
Luscius Uta
Unleashed' Fury Forsaken Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 07:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hector Biggz wrote:Hello, I am sure you (as am I) are all waiting on an update to EFT. I want to provide Gripen with a show of appreciation and encouragement to get EFT updated as soon as he can.
I am donating 1B isk to Gripen. This is probably peanuts for him and I am hoping the EVE community will join me so we can truly show the thanks we have for the effort he has put into EFT over the years. It has become an essential part of my game.
If you want to participate in this noble effort then please send me the isk you want to donate with "EFT FTW!" entered as the reason.
I will pool and secure this isk and present Gripen with the healthy reward he deserves on the day the EFT update and is made available with the data from the Retribution expansion.
I will update the amount of the GIFT daily in this thread.
CURRENT GIFT is @ 1 B isk.
My goal for the GIFT is 10B isk.
Please send your donations and post in this thread!
100M sent, waiting for double amount...oh wait, that's a different scam |
Luscius Uta
Unleashed' Fury Forsaken Federation
44
|
Posted - 2013.06.10 12:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
JOE bastardface wrote:seems like the capital core defense capacitor safeguard is not effecting the capital shield booster like it should now, i think it has to do with it not using the shield operation skill
Same thing with other capital rigs that used to have "has no effect on capital sized modules" disclamier (which is srill shown in EFT for capital rigs) |
Luscius Uta
82
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 10:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
I found a bug, apparently caused because EFT doesn't expect your EHP to be a 9-digit number:
http://imgur.com/Q1eX9Sr
Highsec is for casuals. |
Luscius Uta
90
|
Posted - 2014.05.30 19:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Xendora wrote:Not a bug at all. That's scientific notation. That number = ~ 127,671,000.
I wasn't aware of a scientific notation which puts a period right after a comma (with no digits between), but it's been a long time since I graduated so things might've changed since then
Can't know if that's an issue with number formatting in Windows or with EFT itself, though.
Highsec is for casuals. |
Luscius Uta
101
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 08:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Loki's resist profile is wrong - it should have 60% shield resist to thermal damage, but EFT shows 50%. People hate highsec for various reasons. Mine is the terrible metallic music that plays on and on. |
Luscius Uta
114
|
Posted - 2014.11.05 09:25:44 -
[7] - Quote
I just found out that the newest version ignores Armor compensation skills.
Highsec sucks.
|
Luscius Uta
114
|
Posted - 2014.11.18 08:39:40 -
[8] - Quote
The latest version incorrectly calculates cargo capacity of the Nereus, meaning that the capacity is displayed as if not affected by the pilot's Gallente Industrial skill (regardless of whether you use "All level V" or API-imported character).
Highsec sucks.
|
Luscius Uta
133
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 08:19:49 -
[9] - Quote
In the next release I would like to see propulsion modules grouped by size, like it's done with most other modules that come in different sizes (neuts, shield extenders, smartbombs...).
I'm not fat, I'm just over-tanked!
|
Luscius Uta
151
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 07:17:03 -
[10] - Quote
I have a feature suggestion, Missile damage calculator: You open a fit with missile launchers, right click under "Firepower", specify target's signature radius and velocity and it calculates your practical DPS. I know that DPS graph does a similar thing, but this way you won't need to have a full fit and can just specify only those two variables that matter. |
|
|
|
|